Re: [s-d] [s-b] Wording it in a completely non-objectionable manner

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bina.

- 0x44

On Apr 4, 2009, at 23:48, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>  
> wrote:
> > I submit a proposal, titled "Wording it in a completely
> > non-objectionable manner":
> >
> > {Create a new rule, titled "Foolishness":
> >
> > {Those who have been foolish enough to agree to the ruleset of B  
> > Nomic
> > on Agora are hereby burdened with the obligation to ensure that B
> > Nomic follows the rules of Agora. If a party to the ruleset of B  
> > Nomic
> > on Agora comes to their senses and ceases to be a party, this
> > obligation no longer applies to them, as it's really a very silly
> > obligation.}}
> >
> > This will make B Nomic a partnership and allow it to register. It  
> > will
> > not allow Agora's rule of law to seep in and order anyone around,
> > unless the orderees have decided they want to be ordered around for
> > some reason.
> >
> > --Warrigal
>
> So, the obligatory question. Why did you vote AGAINST this?
>
> --Warrigal
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss