Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Regeneration

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:24 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:14:56 -0400, Jamie Dallaire
>> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I move that we limit the doctor's responsibility to rule-defined
>> automatic
>>> events and to announced future game actions, excluding any that rely on
>>> objection/support. I think the onus should be on the actor emself to
>> carry
>>> out the dependent action after the proper period has elapsed and
>>> support/objection has been cleared.
>> Dependent actions occur automatically after the requisite time period has
>> passed if the dependencies have been fulfilled.
>>
> 
> Yep. I just meant that it would be nice to change that back to what we had
> it as for a while (manual occurence, responsibility of the performer)
> because IMO the way it is right now can be a pain for ministers.

Like I said, I was going to propose that, but changed my mind and
proposed creating a ministry specifically to track such events.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss