Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156

Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:17:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:17:31 -0400
In-reply-to: <dc05cc2c0903121254p740a3eabkb86b80969ef0c0c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240903100528m64e0f756rb49457ca9d8c40d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240903100934r48ff3434m7a57a6fc2400dccc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0903101039h5a3ac036rb493aed09b878ea8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B6B624.7060405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0903121254p740a3eabkb86b80969ef0c0c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I've just reread the proposal and Rule 5-3 and I guess I'm wrong.
> I submit the following ballot:
>
> 1909 - FOR

This is the only vote you've submitted to the PF this nweek; would you
like to re-vote on the other proposals to the public forum?
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Wording it in a completely non-objectionable manner
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread