M P Darke on Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:47:44 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: precedence system


Wasn't there a big hoo-haa about it when someone tried to change the Rules because their Contract said they could modify the Contract by removing one Rule and adding another?

On a side note, a malapropism is where you say one thing and mean your mother...

--- On Mon, 9/3/09, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b]   Proposal: precedence system
To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 9 March, 2009, 5:25 PM



On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:22:57 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke
<darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, I was refering to the "The Minister of Law Must remove this
> paragraph" bit...
> 

It authorizes him to do so, what's your problem?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss