Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

Ed Murphy on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:37:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:37:22 -0800
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W28A3ED72DE7C1764A0809085AA0@xxxxxxx>
References: <376910.80954.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902230916m7d5124cdjb291e84f692123bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A2E0B3.5080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090226230251.E25651007C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902261615t4b51e34ct4cd1243e9dca202b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W28A3ED72DE7C1764A0809085AA0@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

JamesB wrote:

> What about Lukos? We could still do with a few more playuers for that...

I took another look, and it appears to basically just be Suber's
initial ruleset with a few generic contract/asset/health rules
tacked onto the end.  I'll pass.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Warrigal

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Joel Uckelman
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: James Baxter

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread