Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: ais523@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:49:06 +0000
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
> 
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:43 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
> > The problem is that apparently, the text on the "static" page can
> > still be changed with a bit of trickery.
> It's a MediaWiki thing. You have a static copy of the page in question,
> but the page is full of instructions like "include the current text of
> the page at (page name here)". Those instructions stay as "include the
> current text", not "include the text at the same time this snapshot was
> taken"; therefore, the text on the static page (as opposed to the
> instructions there) can be changed by editing the pages it includes.
> -- 
> ais523
> 

 

The pages I have referennced do not include instructions like "include the current text of the page at". They are merely the current rules, the previous version of Rule 0 and the list of Players at this time.

_________________________________________________________________
Love Hotmail?  Check out the new services from Windows Live! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/132630768/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss