Elliott Hird on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:01:27 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating


2009/2/22 Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> The interpretation at hand is that B's comments are not "greedy regexp",
> several B eras have indeed passed, several years of gameplay have actually
> happened, and no Points of Order recently passed, due to the lack of any Yea
> votes. The first three are plain sanity, the latter is disambiguating
> pedantry.
>
> This allows the next nweek to begin. Unless you want to be obstructionist.
>
> j
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


Did you miss the part where the non-greedy interpretation was found to
also break the game?

la la la.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss