| Craig Daniel on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:57 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Straw poll |
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a non-binding straw poll on how we should continue. > > Options: > A) Social Construction: B's gamestate is what we thought it was all > along; comments aren't a problem and the Tweak turning quoted text > into Comment Monsters can probably be fixed with a new State of Unrest > in which people vote correctly and use Contradictoriness as intended > by the rule. This is my second choice. Sort of. We'd have to decide which version of B's gamestate to use. > B) Strict Platonism: the wording of the comment rule made it > impossible to submit proposals at some time in the past, and we can > recover the gamestate from that point and continue the game. Theoretically tidy, but a pain in the ass. And it's ancient history anyhow, since proposals can't have become unsubmittable recently. > C) Ancient History: Scrap B and continue with A Nomic using its > existing ruleset. Joel would probably appreciate one of use replacing > em as Administrator :). This is my preference. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss