Craig Daniel on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:48:46 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal


On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> teucer wrote:
>
>> Rule 2e104/0 (Power=3)
>> B may not be A Nomic, but it is a Nomic (Essential)
>>
>> In the interest of safeguarding Agora's nomic-ness, if a change to the
>
> You missed a bit.

Man, imagine living in a world where B Nomic's rules attempt to
safeguard Agora's status as a Nomic.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss