Craig Daniel on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:52:05 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency?


On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:29 AM,  <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:36:36 -0500, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I believe in non-greedy comments. But it's better to be safe than sorry.
>
> If non-greedy comments are correct, then emergencies no longer exist, as
> they've been replaced by Unrest and the Call to Order procedure. So having
> an emergency is not enough to collapse the game state.

So? I went Paranoid. In the event of non-greedy comments, that's the
correct thing to do to start the procedures formerly involved in an
emergency.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss