| Justin Ahmann on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:08:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator |
I think it's time for C Nomic. Or possibly D or E. On the other hand, we could pull some cool stunt with retroactivity... Codae ________________________________ From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:58:57 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ...So, if we're being greedy about it, the game is even more messed up than we thought? Yes. Because every proposal for five years - and almost certainly much longer; that's just the oldest easy ruleset to pull up right now - worked. (Actually, ones that would have added new rules were ineffectual if they failed. But other than that...) _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss