| bnomic on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:49:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version |
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:45:25 -0800, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The rules don't require voters to identify proposals in any particular > fashion, just in some fashion. The Rules do oblige the Chairman to identify proposals in a particular fashion though, so your point is moot. "The Chairman is obligated to assign a new Proposal Number that is greater than all previously used Proposal Numbers to each proposal with a number of null. " _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss