|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:29:09 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's get this sorted out...
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's get this sorted out...
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:29:02 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ExCvWn55AI72gRSp9lNZhWqtm931z8HXHrujh9LJt+4=; b=aiQx75F2mS/2y5fNtETyNxv5J0jChO3Qc+cNuw9jc9T5riuH3MoD4h63qIPt8sbhYf kWLy2nwqAefgNrklVP3DaZXtjvNxdff97+9gRu4bWhD+Tg7dz0JN07SKgaidbBduA5pg NkhOg01UXax9m4Gjsbg2Bs9Plsz0LXIHflhtk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=V2h0M77zNQ0TsJT80/ZNlVNFgtc0KfltyvTzUFdbcWdnngOlh5bDMoJdOytZbyqJoL UQfJJp6LpgKjRKwhoZClcZPNLaxFRhnHC+ZBc+Zy2njKnxRwEBdE/XbxRsyaI/v6c43i C2dMrTJODTggxsWRbFfeBa4KZ/ChmJjaQyqxg=
- In-reply-to: <990069.56059.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <990069.56059.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In that case, I never could have had a Well-Sharpened Pencil, therefore
> I should have ten Macks more than I currently have, so your argument
> falls to bits.
Um. No.
You should (and do) have ten more macks than the PD shows - but you've
had them all along. No retroactive changes are happening.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss