Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Ed Murphy on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:59:46 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:01:04 -0800
In-reply-to: <df952b52de28f6f158eb54357fe7a731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <349823.2095.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <df952b52de28f6f158eb54357fe7a731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

0x44 wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:06:16 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke
> <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can)
> INCONSISTENT.
> Find is not a Rules-sanctioned synonym for Claim.

It doesn't need to be.  Unlike the Panic Button fiasco, there's no other
reasonable game-relevant meaning that it could have.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: bnomic

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread