Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Then how about allowing people to vote on the judgment and the
>> Oracularity separately?
>
> Why, that sounds like a mechanism we've already got. It's called a
> "proposal" - or, if you're in a hurry with something urgent and
> obviously needed, a "tweak".

But at the moment Consultations have no effect whatsoever. Who cares
what some Priest Answers if we can just ignore it?  I say we get rid
of the Answer altogether and *just* have Oracularities that work like
judicial orders.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss