Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 23 Jan 2009, at 23:04, Craig Daniel wrote:
>
>> They don't have any game-mechanical effect, but the comments found in
>> the rules are part of the rules and can be no more changed at will
>> than the titles.
>
> No, it's very clear: comment text has no effect on the gamestate therefore
> it simply isn't there.

The comment text we think is there isn't, because it had no way to get
there. (After all, in proposals it was just comment text that couldn't
become rules.) I'm thinking it would be a Good Thing for Priests to
put comment text into the rules, that means nothing but a
clarification. If somehow they can already do so, then that's even
better - we don't need a rule change to implement it. I don't think
they can, though.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss