Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Craig Daniel on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:30:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:30:33 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zx/iFKZ2H/zrVISz3gY8Ep8OECCobSsDtHU8HwoUkNA=; b=GkmWEdndqd4jBffHEtN5uovA2WSsAJEzJwBrQePlWmn0s+q9iI2TKoXpXDzZavMMRl H4h7ICnvFkQ2lDlRd/ulwLyWSxAaB5BA/rHueAHhmFPG7u27Cl81hsLJypDF5qVT7mie YO75jI47eUDa7bRM7S89m6WOJwZouqc1lKppo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=wZ4KHLGPYXCX0hbPtEJrAvGBDB1qCMGx3Lw8QSBhQ9p9VrNP0GvfGXAO+hwt5rF6pw Se6iv1/c1Vq5UsygG8dQPMADFR+inJac8+p5PljIKSQmDEGyE62wqaW174QZ2FMumWnU FZe5epe3W8tqVIeNizRw83y+o55vIXmiEBr4E=
In-reply-to: <497A5230.9050509@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <467960.21565.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4979C41E.20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901230758w3d058054j5c70903cf977b734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43AD850E-829C-432A-846C-985C610052CC@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901230825j2854ae97x9c4b1d6f7d43a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9BD21C76-81E3-43EF-A835-228F787D9875@xxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W3850C561A710D9F63688B85CF0@xxxxxxx> <55b258c20901231438u38e825fcp4ba9674d9c7fe219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <497A5230.9050509@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> teucer wrote:
>
>> I really don't like the idea of people having to declare something
>> they agree with INCONSISTENT just because it's got a shitty patch
>> associated with it.
>
> Then how about allowing people to vote on the judgment and the
> Oracularity separately?

Why, that sounds like a mechanism we've already got. It's called a
"proposal" - or, if you're in a hurry with something urgent and
obviously needed, a "tweak".
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread