Elliott Hird on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:53:22 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordainment + Unique Game Object Names Consultation



On 22 Jan 2009, at 21:47, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

BTW, I'm thinking the best resolution to the problem I laid out below (if you agree it's a problem) would be to get rid of the piece of 4E42 that says a game object can't come to have the same name as another game object, and
simply rely on individual restrictions where they are needed. e.g. as
already exist for player name changes or for submitting contracts.

It really doesn't matter if two weapons have the same name, I think (as long
as we're clear about usage permissions based on ownership)

Yikes, your arguments are convincing.

BUT repealing that part of 5E42 (you went back an era there :P) is probably
the wrong solution: let's just narrow it down to only certain types.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss