|
teucer on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:54:50 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Correcting any confusion about the nweek changeover.
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Correcting any confusion about the nweek changeover.
- From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:54:43 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YuxU86+z6NIVJaosD+ajmtI7smGq6Kro2sFjhCffrCY=; b=lEXQrS0uV/NmFovyrQhOs1muBTsjluv0T7wKPHhqqBx6mGPn2kpRqCEP4G+UBjNICb vvwfBaTnPkO+henl0aWUzt/SMrCu71dGh6bZMPkF00ozzmN1fbDdhd12fM2TGsBMFLGP PuOYveKQi4Wpyl3dds521mp03ZQ+mADzFoPzM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Tcu44fT4pJrf42Xj6YZCozKsdxfGH8pbwab2YF1pMhLu1pGnmWL2J1cvl3YrxnqmQz K4cRBHYASTg5qHkZYmeZgw3MHBm39ZFF9a187wNOxTLM8ncP+ZYP6xBKov+nIkJgAGKx NfvzbLoYgEW4m4dShAW72FrkdL5EivFbMFvEU=
- In-reply-to: <4975DCB8.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <55b258c20901191603p46939479k90eb8428c7a6fa9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4975DCB8.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 1/20/09, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Craig Daniel wrote:
>> I submit the following Tweak:
>>
>> {All proposals listed as Open in the Ballot distributed by the
>> Chairman during the current nweek are Open, and have a voting period
>> ending at the end of this nweek.}
>>
> I object, if I do not publish a Ballot the clock does not turn on. With
> the Clock off it will take longer than a Jiffy to publish a Ballot,
> leaving me in violation of my ministerial duties.
I confess I don't really understand the objection. The tweak wouldn't
keep you from publishing a ballot, it would make whatever ballot you
do publish correct (and thus, if you included the
not-pending-but-not-failed proposals it would lead to a vaguely sane
result).
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss