|
comex on Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:53:58 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
|
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
- From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:53:53 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6TfIZb4DGP4xChHc6uC1SGSb1Sj174DHz6TBIMvAoh4=; b=ZrcLaq/P+izLczdKsKEskrp8SM1c90UUEK0o58vFq3QZG7EPu/4hHja0lKjH2DsFTb 9BOOnwac5L+IY4Sy73d234f8WrI1Dfx/vYpx1J7HBVrj1SfFiBvYzEG37Sezz8fh5k39 Rt9lBzevAzRo45RyXTOFl0tt0nLloZeBfEt6g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ruC4al1XZlcBer6/PucU69/IyeNy8BxrBHQLUwDU5mG09rUhW0Yc6NDWAksxegqAG7 JqiOCFairupsnOtUPS6ns0fNX/AdHGwWiN9SjywkGcYa7yfO6CSMWz5cji9xUCdGOcGH aprhzTt5hxnCD8NGM8tdVNfDTn6oe3h9G/Wn8=
- In-reply-to: <55b258c20901061123h233c6d92o8b9f83e9cc79ebb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <211171.74435.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e6cef6f4ced39690c1b8d9bd07e6cce2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901061123h233c6d92o8b9f83e9cc79ebb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rule 5e10 defers to everything that would stop you from doing things,
> so there is no Rule 5e3333.
No, it doesn't: only the timing clause does, at present, and the
multiple-actions clause also says Game Actions work. yes, ehird's RP
would change this
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss