| Tyler on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:31:15 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture |
Yes, I remember last time I ZOTted a Consultation people liked. And I am heeding that advice. See Consultation 191. And if you want to resubmit, I'll assign it. I just didn't think people would go for it. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5 Jan 2009, at 22:09, Tyler wrote: > > I ZOT this Consultation. Oracle's a bit swamped right now. And I don't >> think >> there's ground to stand on here. Things cannot be done in the past; that's >> just common sense. Reality trumps any rules that say contrary. If anyone >> else agrees with M P Darke, I suggest you make the Consultation more >> general. Like "Can a Player forfeit in the past?" Then I'll reconsider >> accepting it. >> > > Last time you were the Oracle we told you to stop zotting consultations > you thought you knew the answer to. > > You might want to heed this advice. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss