Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.

Craig Daniel on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:57:19 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.

To: spoon-discuss <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:57:14 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=OMz8DeT0wNX0fSarqqFFQgP3jPcS+G3G5D3ZPJ8uVaE=; b=ekFDGVdEADsdXlVEsPfDa3hPucyVeIbjKDy9/dYPnqZGqwAd8p0C3K7GFtcsQk5GNT 3JSA5Z+I87RdmrBRJ2z3kYIhYWTXBEH8fMBzn8R/XVUM6wQlg9GCRkMa4VjCsd0Mj42p Cb+QuLvOTO22jlyBMUBZ3UZDzDqACtiDCYiqA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=vUNoHWceC+4ntS/BzJnEuW6wD2Q77HtK3O0LRw6sVlSlFHKUsL7PtJtZORpOHLa59b 02/wvgTEur+bFf8+ICDntJWKtbII33z7qw1PhV7tqghNlBUcfgVUC6QxtC2YwI9aQNF5 Ri0oTJpflq+9BMrSMKgbZLkIpB2y5n7UgazIc=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20901051256n2158d7f0n6734c74470179e58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <c11904e6a2c1d227c6f8baf6ee8d8364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ce49894a01000b229465388ef4cb7cc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3087D493-8205-4253-9540-2AA0377A5B6A@xxxxxxxxx> <4962692E.7070703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840901051250u51a9e5e1l3075571e7f38542d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901051256n2158d7f0n6734c74470179e58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Charles Schaefer
> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Note: I think ehird is a PEP (I also think that he is probably a player. The
>> recent Answer involving interpretation of 5E1 is a stretch.), but one more
>> just in case wouldn't hurt.
>
> I agree, ehird is a PEP.
>
> And I agree that my stuff about 5e1 is a bit of a stretch, but it's
> the last and least significant of the four arguments. Two and three,
> which speak to why ehird's wrong about 5e10, are the ones that explain
> why it is that I believe e's not a player. But as long as that isn't
> pondered, I regard ehird as a PEP.
>
> Why you guys see the need for an Emergency, I do not know. But I
> hereby trigger J's contractual

No I don't.

That was me starting to trigger J's contractual obligation to
designate a forum, before realizing there was no point.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread