Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 190

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I object. Sorry OCB, but if that were the vote that made the difference, it
would split the game universe.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:21 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Tough question, but I answer Consultation 190 YES as it is likely that
> there is an External Force with the name Fred (there are
> > plenty of people outside the game with the name Fred). To give a serious
> answer, The beast is defined as an Outsider and must
> > therefore be an External Force. Rule 5E4 takes precedence over Rule 5E50
> but that is irrelevant as the two Rules do not conflict,
> > Rule 5E50 merely states that the Beast is an Outsider and defers to the
> Rule 5E4 definition of an Outsider causing the Beast to
> > become an External Force.
>
> Unfortunately, you're missing the part where rule 5E4 defines an
> External Force - and its definition does not include the OCB.
>
> In any case, though, I intend without objection to cause the Beast to
> find JamesB's judgment of Consultation 190 CONSISTENT.
>
> > So although we have no idea what External Force is behind Fred (the
> Ranger perhaps?), there is definitely a case for Fred being an
> > External Force (otherwise we could end up with no beast)
>
> Hm. Can a single External Force be two Game Objects? If so, is it one
> Outsider or two?
>
>  - teucer
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss