Charles Schaefer on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:11:27 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?


2009/1/4, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On 4 Jan 2009, at 23:40, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> And like I said, I don't see what can deny anyone the
>> right to stop playing. Even the rules cannot do this, except as a legal
>> fiction.
>>
>
> Yes, but legally, I am still a Player.


Then my claim of inconsistency is irrelevant and it shouldn't bother
you. From your own reasoning:
2009/1/2, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
>  WHAT IS THE RULES BASIS FROM THEM BEING DESTROYED?
>>
>> nothing! Nothing!
>>
>> This Consultation isn't even Influential! It doesn't make them so, it is
>> merely FALSE!
>>
>> The rules do not say they are destroyed. They simply don't. And this
>> consultation can't change that.
>>
>> You are all batshit insane and consistent-ing in a simply INCORRECT
>> judgment.
>>
>> So my claims of inconsistency won't change your status as a player and
>> consultations don't do a damn thing except put the Priest's opinion to a
>> non-binding vote.
>>
> --
> w1n5t0n aka
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss