Alex Smith on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:58:12 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ehirds macks...


On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 16:55 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2009, at 16:46, M P Darke wrote:
> 
> > Come to me, pretty shiny macks...
> 
> Uh, where's the rule forbidding this again? I'm sure we had one.
> 
> Anyway, this fails horribly:
> No Game Object may come to have the same name as another Game Object.
"Nobody" is pretty surely not a game object, is it? If it is, then True
and False are game objects by the same reasoning, and I'm not sure that
makes sense.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss