Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 14:16 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2009, at 11:26, James Baxter wrote:
> 
> > I find this CONSISTENT as nothing can be done with the macks and  
> > they are not being legally owned by anyone (they can't even be  
> > owned by Nobody) therfore I find a judgement that they be destroyed  
> > to be right.
> 
> WHAT IS THE RULES BASIS FROM THEM BEING DESTROYED?
> 
> nothing! Nothing!
> 
> This Consultation isn't even Influential! It doesn't make them so, it  
> is merely FALSE!
> 
> The rules do not say they are destroyed. They simply don't. And this  
> consultation can't change that.
> 
> You are all batshit insane and consistent-ing in a simply INCORRECT  
> judgment.

Whether they're destroyed or not, there definitely is a rules basis for
them no longer being owned by you if they exist.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss