Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

0x44 on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:19:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:17:09 -0600
In-reply-to: <285c99840812311617s1409886bp1f630745b1aeff6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812311526y2983f8a8i69bff80bca335064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311609i557c3f34tc2acaf732884cfa5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495C09E3.2060407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311617s1409886bp1f630745b1aeff6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Charles Schaefer wrote:

Consultations have the effect of setting precedent.

Would you rather I phrase it like this:
As Punishment, I assign a Fine of all macks formerly owned by ehird on any
legal entity which possesses them and on B Nomic generally for all unowned
macks. (I obviously can't do that, btw)

You couldn't do that because the Consultation was not phrased as aviolation of the Rules.


--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread