Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:46:39 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah


On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > And the Emergency Forum ais523 set up was accessible at the time of its
> > designation. That was on step 3 of Rule 5E0, specifically fulfilling
> > "Posting about the Emergency Forum on all official discussion and public
> > fora is considered a sufficient effort. ". We're currently on step 5.
>
> Rule 5E0 says: "The Emergency Forum must be reasonably accessible to all
> PEPs."
>
> There is no indication that this requirement stops being in effect
> when the emergency process changes to a different step.


Indeed.

What would happen if, say, spoon-business had been designated as the EF in
an unquestionably legitimate manner, then crashed while the Pause was 4?

We need to add in a provision for changing the EF along the way (only if
required, of course), methinks.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss