Re: [s-d] [s-b] Dictatorship consultations

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> 2008/12/26, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> > House pays 13 macks against m10 for option 1 pondered True, 12 macks
> > against your m10 for option 2 pondered True. Betting phase ends at Priest
> > assignment.
>
>
> What if one of the bettors is selected Priest?
>
> Gratuituous argument: Even if the Emergency over there is valid, it is
> still
> in its voting phase (I think), which means no player could have changed the
> gamestate by dictatorship when these consultations were submitted.


They took the actions that would have made them dictators before the
emergency started. The emergency not yet being over, it cannot have undone
their dictatorships, if these exist.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss