Warrigal on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:56:21 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation


On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Question:  Is an e-mail address described to a person by specifying
> domain and MD5 checksum, but not account name (e.g. describing
> cabal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as "the address at jaycampbell.com with MD5
> checksum 4dcd83b0338eaee8e8f8196f34095d18"), reasonably accessible
> to that person (as required of Emergency Fora by Rule 5E0)?

Standing players: JamesB, 0x44, Murphy, teucer, ehird, Billy Pilgrim.
Sitting players: BobTHJ.

The possible priests are JamesB (1), 0x44 (2), teucer (3), ehird (4),
and Billy Pilgrim (5). I will use the dice server to assign this,
Consultation 179, due to the obvious conflict of interest.

--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss