Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultations on the Pencil Sharpener

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:13, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 15:58, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> {Question: Are the answers to Pondered Consultations correct, after
>>> the Consultations become Pondered?
>>> Unbeliever: ehird
>>> Arguments: if not, then what the fuck is the point of Consultations?
>>
>> Tsk, tsk....if this were Agora I'd dock you a prop for language.
>
> If the Oracle wishes to zot my consultation for language, I will be
> happy to resubmit a version edited to not contain any swear words.
> Specifically, the Question would be the same but the Arguments would
> be replaced by "If not, then our justice system is the most pointless
> thing ever and anyone who has ever been ordained is an utter moron who
> is cordially invited to apply reduced pressure to a portion of my
> anatomy which I would not have had I been born without a Y
> chromosome."
>
> It's up to BP. We can have the offensive version, or the version with
> a word that you probably shouldn't say in church.
>
Come on now, is that how you would phrase a question to a priest? :)

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss