Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Refactor vote tallies (again)

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
> >> With more than one tweak per nweek, regular proposals would only be
> useful
> >> for issues where the majority wanted to impose its will on a minority
> (who
> >> would object to a tweak).
> >
> >
> > Indeed. Good point.
>
> And the problem with that is, what exactly?
>
> Tweaks are a good way to make things happen faster, and in the Eternal
> Nweek of the Spotless Game we're seeing a pretty darn clear idea of
> what the value of that is.
>
> In other words, allowing more tweaks means opting for a game where
> more gets done by Tweaks, and less by Proposals. But that is not
> inherently a bad thing, just a different one. If you're going to be
> scared of changing how things are done, don't play Nomic.


Yeah. You're right too :-)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss