| Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:59:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Refactor vote tallies (again) |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Jamie Dallaire > <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Jamie Dallaire > >> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > argh. so... what's a "registered voter"? It's never mentioned anywhere > >> else > >> > in the rules. Nothing says it's the same thing as being eligible... > >> > >> I become paranoid. > > > > > > Anyone still have a Tweak that can fix this instead? > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > I do. Give me the text of the needed Tweak, otherwise it will be > "replace all instances of 'Registered' in the ruleset with 'eligible'" > Actually, I think that works. Might as well standardize by capitalizing Eligible, too. Before you submit the Tweak... is there ANYONE who sees a reason why just switching registered to eligible would NOT work??? BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss