Re: [s-d] [s-b] Question about the Clock

Justin Ahmann on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:45:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Question about the Clock

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Question about the Clock
From: Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=fK01te/7zG/v+1oD//XBBxhqFggaTUg88xN9lW11EliGzXw9YoYaaguhqU1XnEr3rMk8z7ioZJNaSZMOSGY5l5h4jdIshQrEbc1Up8EgphWgf+zkrlPdurkJ8md6uRy9f9+N6+JekQiQcJHKEivvwl7FUhnbsykEGjT9raNQuLE=;

The part where the lines were bad was not within the Tweak.  There was a '}' in there.

But, yes, please see if you can get the replies to format right.

Codae




________________________________
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 7:20:44 AM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Question about the Clock


On 13 Dec 2008, at 11:00, James Baxter wrote:

> {Rule 5E14 should be ammended by replacing the following paragraph:

You didn't intend to activate, but I object.

Please, newlines!

And 'should' does nothing.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Templatize randomness
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Question about the Clock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread