Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal

Elliott Hird on Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:06:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:40:10 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=YckNk3LVeLdhS+we7LUMZyez59TD3ZgfGwDLUhoK27A=; b=BMY1n4OxsLl4DwJR6/uLdkLcOK1wASTWLECR/LNyefenfx3dpx0CWkukaiKf4Vz+nv 8x4pQJaeazl6wrpozm/QdBDZn1wHQNwcNf2FgwfjGk+hsN4yfG7eqOhAND/s4QXthnS5 ORKHuNdBvox/Ac7HM85B12eGST13aRUQuznlA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=vzQqxHDcLXliMdL5a9CQUBXHhMmxU/evJsYYT8yqHyrUY/1kKDYWovXbTCW9jQ1uFs jIFCOTdv5qqoTDjAjxBq1aAgY0EgdBDRtQqFBr9ETNE7Lv7V/BYl2iOr4Ky4QGbTdrtU 9Ih4bFxZvWqEYI+grbkLOGGWoBX1o6rCp8QiI=
In-reply-to: <493D643D.8040705@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1228473885.7840.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812051900y4e37c0bek7b0f0278bb5aa56b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1228734391.8288.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <58D2C66D-7C4A-4C49-B7E8-C6ABD5F44F87@xxxxxxxxx> <493D643D.8040705@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 8 Dec 2008, at 18:15, Ed Murphy wrote:

Ah yes, I was just about to point out that some consider "X has a fee
of Y" and "X has a penalty of Y" as socially, as well as mechanically,
equivalent.  There's also a side debate over whether it's acceptable
to violate SHALL NOTs if you believe you can use the letter of the law
to scam your way out of the intended punishment.


Well, only in nomic. :P
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread