Elliott Hird on Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:08:10 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal


On 8 Dec 2008, at 11:06, Alex Smith wrote:

(The argument in Agora was about whether it was acceptable to
deliberately violate such a rule; IMO, the intention of such rules is
that accidental violations work but are illegal, and players who are
abiding the rules shouldn't violate them deliberately).

I, along with comex, disagree, by the way, because as there is an
in-game resolution mechanism, the criminal system, it is acceptable
to violate SHALL NOTs if you believe you can take the punishment.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss