Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>      * Things which could cause a lot of unknown gamestate if they
>        stalled or went wrong, such as assigning CFJs (= Oracularities;
>        this matters because judges can't judge for a while after having
>        a case assigned to them), and setting voting power, always
>        succeed whenever anyone attempts them;
What, what?  Since when is increasing voting power pragmatic?  I want :-P

>        Incorrect
>        proposal results don't cause this instantly, but instead after a
>        week if nobody challenges them. (This gives pretty much a
>        universal fix mechanism which nobody's actually had to use yet,
>        due to the other mechanisms available; just submit a proposal
>        and purport to resolve it, and as long as nobody challenges what
>        you're doing it works.)

I still think Rule 2034.2 prevents that from actually working.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss