Re: [s-d] [s-b] RP Submission

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, I voted it down to prevent any ambiguities. Otherwise I wouldn't have
cared whether it won or not.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> > 2008/12/4, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > I submit the following Refresh Proposal:
> > > {
> > > All Paranoid PEPs become Calm.
> > > }
> > >
> > > Billy Pilgrim
> >
> >
> > I get the feeling I've seen this before.
> >
> > PS: Don't worry everyone, I don't intend to resubmit {Enact whichever RP
> > would have won if this one hadn't}, although it did better than I
> expected
> > last time. (I expected one person to jump on the bandwagon with me and
> > everyone else to rank it in the bottom 2).
>
>
> Ha I expected that too. I honestly just wasn't sure that the result of
> enacting this RP would be that easy to determine. It might all depend on
> what would have caused it not to be won, which was not specified. Didn't
> win
> because it wasn't submitted? Or does the runner-up win? I'm not sure that
> yields the same result. Or did it not win because one of the votes didn't
> get submitted? etc.
>
> BP
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss