Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts

0x44 on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:18:43 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:18:28 -0600
In-reply-to: <493702B9.3010002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49361852.5000506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812022257x467639e2g175225b2bd84b3a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <493702B9.3010002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Jay Campbell wrote:
> Majority vote style B contracts are institutionalized indenturement, 
> from what I've seen.
>   
Hey, we let you out.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministries
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM and Contracts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread