Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't really mind what era we call it, but numbering rules 4.1E17 is just
ugly. Please let's not.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:08 AM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I like the changes brought by ehird's RP, and they're large in scope,
> but not as large as the scope of previous new eras, at least one of
> which involved a complete Rule reset.  As it is, nearly all our Rules
> are identical to the 4E versions.  I don't think this should be
> considered the fifth era-- save that for something more important.
> Instead, I propose calling our current Era the Late Fourth Era,
> numbered 4.1.
>
> So I submit the following proposal: {
> Renumber all rules by replacing "5E" with "4.1E".
> Amend Rule 4.1E8 by replacing "5E" with "4.1E".
> Amend Rule 4.1E17 by replacing "Fifth Era" with "Late Fourth Era".
> }
>
> (If "Late Fourth Era" sounds too negative, maybe "High Fourth Era"?)
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss