Re: [s-d] ranked pairs

Charles Schaefer on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:01:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] ranked pairs

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:43 -0800
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650811261901g2a7f93b8i87bf7fe67141c615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650811261901g2a7f93b8i87bf7fe67141c615@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/11/26, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hmmmmm.....
>
> Is it just me, or did we process the votes from the last emergency (a few
> weeks ago) as instant runoff rather than as ranked pairs (as called for by
> Rule 0?)...
>
> Just pointing that out, though I'm guessing it's all auto-ratified by now
> (IF the ranking algorithm even made a difference)
>
> BP


Last emergency, the procedure called for IRV. Someone changed it since then.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] ranked pairs
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
Previous by thread: [s-d] ranked pairs
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] ranked pairs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread