Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/11/26, Elliott Hird penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>
> > Really, I like all three of them, it's just that yours and J's are
> > a little
> > more extreme than necessary and I think if we vote for Murphy's
> > (which,
> > according to current trends, we will not) then the next round of
> > RPs will
> > yeild something a bit more conservative (at least from me).
>
> I really don't get where this came from; mine is not extreme...


I consider the concept of replacing ALL the rules (even if some of them are
reenacted with similar wording) a little extreme. The renumbering part sure
is. Also, the whole Grid thing is new (I kind of like it, but I would rather
have things like this made into traditional proposals). (Yes, I know we had
one in the first era, but it's new to me)

While we're on the subject, did you intentionally remove contracts or was
that just an oversight? When your RP wins I intend to bring them back.

-- 
Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss