Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship

Ed Murphy on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:45:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:43:31 -0800
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0811192023n47dedcd7ra0d512a97bca3458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650811191418r3f9d8bf9td24cbd22cfddf7c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240811191440m420ecd5eo458b248a47b1bcfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20811191456u6b3cd533ndef571371a72fc19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0811192023n47dedcd7ra0d512a97bca3458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Tyler wrote:

> Warrigal hit the nail on the head there. The real conundrum would be if the
> consultation posted here was answered false and the one at the other forum
> answered true. Each would deny its own legitimacy.

I got a win in Agora from a case like that, about two years ago.  :)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship
  - From: Warrigal
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] (if it passed)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm...
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Wooble Dictatorship
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread