Tyler on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:11:26 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] contract


No, I don't know of a rule that prohibits rule-changing. But just because
there's nothing that says you can't, doesn't mean you can. I'm pretty sure
we've been over this once or twice before.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, transaction fails because you can't change rules willy nilly like
> > that. Wooble only did it via Contractual obligation automation.
>
> I think you're correct. But I can't find the rule that says so. If you
> can, tell us which it is? Then we can see whether it takes precedence
> over the contract automation rule and thus prevents Wooble's takeover.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss