Re: [s-d] [s-b] contract

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"performed as if the Player had sent it to the public forum"

You can send any old game action to the public forum. Whether it 
succeeds does not concern Contracts. They only make you *try*.

j


Jay Campbell wrote:
> The contract below fails to have any effect. A stated obligation is not 
> automatically an enforceable obligation, and does not affect the 
> gamestate any more than a clause "Wooble must change all player names to 
> Banana".
>
> The consultation following lacks a Question and is ZOTted.
>
>
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I become bound by the following contract:
>>> {{
>>> Wooble is obligated to create a new Rule with the text: "The player
>>> named Wooble may change the gamestate in any way, at any time."
>>>
>>> Wooble is obligated to amend Rule 4E70 by removing: "When a Player
>>> becomes obligated to perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract,
>>> that Game Action is performed as if the Player had sent it to the
>>> public forum."
>>> }}
>>>     
>>>       
>> As authorized by Rule 4E70, I hereby submit a Consultation indicating
>> that Wooble has failed to add the above-quoted rule and amend Rule
>> 4E70.  I note that if I indeed failed, the priest is obligated to
>> force these actions through in an Oracularity, as that is the only
>> equitable resolution.
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss