Craig Daniel on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:17:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse


On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Haha. Hey, if other people join, then BP could, with his Overbar, entangle
>> them (with support). Then they would each have less voting power than
>> normal, if my calculations are correct.
>>
>> If not for the Antiplayer, you might had a good trick to get people a
>> little
>> more voting power.
>
>
> Yep I took another quick look at that cadavre rule this morning and am
> trying to figure out exactly how best I can use my antiplayer powers to mess
> with teucer's scam.

It's not really a scam, it's a user-generated way of making platforms
mean something.

Of course, for people to buy into it the parties have to be useful.
Pocketbook membership can be used to make a quick buck while
influencing some votes, while Creampuff actually has the power to
slightly disenfranchise non-members if enough people join; after all,
if it has at least half of the players and at least half plus one of
them put something in their platform, it will fail.

If you want, I do have a suggestion for how you can use your overbar
to mess with things in an interesting fashion. But I won't explain it
until the alliance has grown a bit.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss