Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list

Alex Smith on Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:41:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:41:01 +0000
In-reply-to: <285c99840811061438k3c6b5751u1710bc8c0b5d43d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1226005440.10640.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491366FD.30905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1226008589.10640.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453192E0-302C-46BA-B392-8851057D43C8@xxxxxxxxx> <285c99840811061438k3c6b5751u1710bc8c0b5d43d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:38 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> This seems a little bit like an abuse of this procedure to me (tidiness was
> intended to correct errors of grammar, not substantive problems with a
> rule). I don't see why we couldn't put this through the proposal process.
> 
> I'm not objecting, I just wanted to mention that.
This is just simple fixes, I'm changing the rule from Agora language to
B language. There are other problems by the rule which I would prefer to
change by proposal.

Think of it as translating a rule from a different language...

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PD Reform
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread