[s-d] For the record (ranked pairs)

Craig Daniel on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:40:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] For the record (ranked pairs)

To: spoon-discuss <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-d] For the record (ranked pairs)
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:40:11 -0400

I just tried Ranked Pairs on these ballots to see what the results
would have been. By margins of victory of two at each step (larger
than any other margins), the order is: 0x44, teucer, comex, Charles.
So 0x44 would have won in that algorithm also.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] I hereby tally the votes
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] OCB Remote, mkII
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread