| Craig Daniel on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:31:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14 Oct 2008, at 23:23, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > >> New strategy: >> >> Since Charles' actions, IF valid, would clearly break the game, I >> suggest >> civil disobedience. >> >> All obligations imposed on anyone by SCAM can only be enforced >> through the >> Courts, and Charles cannot unilaterally control the Courts. I move >> that no >> one convict any other party (save for, possibly, Charles) of >> failing to >> fulfill an obligation to SCAM. >> >> BP > > support'n dis Eh. I think as jurors/priests/etc. we have an obligation to rule in accordance with what we regard as the truth. On the other hand I fail to believe SCAM actually makes us join it as easily as it thinks, so I can't convict anyone of failing to obey obligations they don't have. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss