Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's try that again while we still can

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In my opinion, officers are obligated to act on behalf of their 
corporations, but only in ways those corporations themselves may act. 
Corporations are subservient to the contracts that define them. The only 
way for an entity to be obligated by a contract is to be directly bound 
to it, or for a chain of contractual text to delegate control elsewhere. 
Naming an entity an officer does not put them under any obligations 
except to send notice to the public forum of actions the corporations 
themselves are performing under their own authority.

>> Question:  Are the Officers of CPA2 obligated to remove the restrictions
>> on mackerel transfers imposed by cTC?
>>
>> Reasoning:  The Officers of CPA2 are obligated to do anything that would
>> maximize CPA2's ability to transfer mackerel and socks to the Pirates.
>>
>> Unbeliever:  comex, for obvious reasons.
>>
>> I also become Ordained.
>>
>>     

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss